There is only one thing we can objectively say that is true about our reality: "There is awareness." Beyond this, we must make assumptions to delve further.
Fundamentally, we can say that the most fundamental thing is differential. We must say this because "before" or without such differential, we have a measurement problem. E.
G. It doesn't matter (no pun intended) if the temperature was 2000k or 200k because without a differential it can be any arbitrary temperature and we can't even talk about it (because we are differentially driven!).
We can express everything as a wavefunction. We can't prove that there are individual separate particles.
We can sum a universe to equal zero in the wavefunction e.g. -1 ,+1 is 0
Using these as a logical framework we can't say that we are separate (from any thing)
In that, we must say that at the universe has a feature of awareness (we are aware)
A thought, also, is an action (a small one)
A thought, limited by thermodynamics, can be amplified intentionally or unintentionally into a larger macro action.
This can put us monkeys on a moon or terraform planets and their entire ecology (unintentionally) toward destruction.
We must amplify the right thoughts.
We are socioecologically Interdependent creatures and this is an unavoidable aspect of our reality.
We must behave as such.
No person should be a billionaire, this makes them a bad person. If they weren'tz they would live as the mean and instead use their talents to support many.
Thank you for sharing this detailed perspective. There’s a lot of deep insight here, especially about awareness as the foundational reality and the importance of socioecological interdependence.
I appreciate the emphasis on awareness as the only absolute truth we can start from, and how everything else depends on assumptions or frameworks like wavefunctions. It’s fascinating how quantum principles challenge our everyday notions of separateness and individuality.
Your point about thoughts being actions and their amplification reminds me how critical intention is in shaping our future, both individually and collectively.
Regarding socioecological interdependence and wealth inequality, I agree that extreme disparities create friction with the interconnected nature of our reality. It raises important ethical questions about how talents and resources should be used.
I wonder, though, how do you see us practically moving toward amplifying the "right" thoughts and embodying this interdependence, especially within the complexity of existing social and economic systems? How can we create structures that reflect these fundamental truths without reducing human motivation and oversimplifying diversity?
There is only one thing we can objectively say that is true about our reality: "There is awareness." Beyond this, we must make assumptions to delve further.
Fundamentally, we can say that the most fundamental thing is differential. We must say this because "before" or without such differential, we have a measurement problem. E.
G. It doesn't matter (no pun intended) if the temperature was 2000k or 200k because without a differential it can be any arbitrary temperature and we can't even talk about it (because we are differentially driven!).
We can express everything as a wavefunction. We can't prove that there are individual separate particles.
We can sum a universe to equal zero in the wavefunction e.g. -1 ,+1 is 0
Using these as a logical framework we can't say that we are separate (from any thing)
In that, we must say that at the universe has a feature of awareness (we are aware)
A thought, also, is an action (a small one)
A thought, limited by thermodynamics, can be amplified intentionally or unintentionally into a larger macro action.
This can put us monkeys on a moon or terraform planets and their entire ecology (unintentionally) toward destruction.
We must amplify the right thoughts.
We are socioecologically Interdependent creatures and this is an unavoidable aspect of our reality.
We must behave as such.
No person should be a billionaire, this makes them a bad person. If they weren'tz they would live as the mean and instead use their talents to support many.
Thank you for sharing this detailed perspective. There’s a lot of deep insight here, especially about awareness as the foundational reality and the importance of socioecological interdependence.
I appreciate the emphasis on awareness as the only absolute truth we can start from, and how everything else depends on assumptions or frameworks like wavefunctions. It’s fascinating how quantum principles challenge our everyday notions of separateness and individuality.
Your point about thoughts being actions and their amplification reminds me how critical intention is in shaping our future, both individually and collectively.
Regarding socioecological interdependence and wealth inequality, I agree that extreme disparities create friction with the interconnected nature of our reality. It raises important ethical questions about how talents and resources should be used.
I wonder, though, how do you see us practically moving toward amplifying the "right" thoughts and embodying this interdependence, especially within the complexity of existing social and economic systems? How can we create structures that reflect these fundamental truths without reducing human motivation and oversimplifying diversity?
Looking forward to your thoughts.