3 Comments
User's avatar
Robert Bradford's avatar

I can't tell whether your arguments are coming from the concepts of Augustine, Aquinas, or Anselm. Can you clarify?

God Objectively's avatar

Although there are thematic parallels, my position is not directly derived from any of them. I am not proposing a highest being within existence or advancing a theological identity. Rather, I am arguing for the necessity of a singular, non contingent ground strictly outside the set of contingent reality, the reference point without which reason, coherence, and justice cannot be sustained.

This conception is neither exclusive to the Christian canon nor to the broader Western intellectual tradition. Forms of this insight appear across various ancient lineages because it reflects a basic feature of the human search for intelligibility, the recognition that truth requires a stable, transcendent ground.

Paradoxically, its very simplicity is what allows it to be repeatedly obscured, subordinated to cultural narrative and identity over time. My concern is to return to that foundational clarity, that the intelligibility of reality depends on a single grounding beyond the contingent order it enables.

Thank you so much for your comment!

Robert Bradford's avatar

Thanks for your clarification.